New Call-to-action

Your email:

Giovanni Ciavarra

David Schwartz

Bridging the Gap Between Science and the Law

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Keeping Up with Asbestos Science is Hard!

asbestos health effects

The science related to asbestos health effects is emerging at break-neck speed.

Four Common Mistakes in Making Science-Based Policy

EHP122n7 COVER FINAL 800px 231x300

Check Out Our Letter to the Editor in Environmental Health Perspectives

Back in July, I read with interest a commentary in Environmental Health Perspectives by Kevin Elliott and and David Resnick discussing an important topic related to litigation involving complex scientific topics: the role of science in setting policy. It was both interesting and disheartening to see the following three common mistakes in using science to set policy.

Effective Use of Science and Regulations in Pharmaceutical Litigation


On October 14th, Innovative Science Solutions organized a webinar with Momentum Events, entitled:

Is Your Adversary Navigating Toxic Tort Litigation Systematically?

Navigation Guide Protocol

The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology is an approach developed by a group of scientists to objectively and transparently evaluate a set of data related to environmental and chemical exposures. 


Importance of Safety Signaling in Drug and Device Litigation

New Call-to-action

Safety signaling is a key scientific disipline that often gets overlooked in personal injury case involving pharmacetutical or medical device products. John Clark and I recently published an article on this topic in the Defense Research Institute's (DRI's) quarterly publication, Rx For the Defense.

5 Things Your Consulting Expert Can Help You Do

Business Consult

Every lawyer knows the importance of finding the perfect testifying expert in complex litigation, such as toxic torts, product liability, or patent disputes. Your testifying expert is the star of the case. You retain him or her to be the face of your case to the court.  This testifying expert must be knowledgeable, credible, persuasive, and personable. Indeed, that perfect testifier can make all the difference and the critical nature of that role cannot be overemphasized.

Are you Forcing your Opposition to Review the Science Systematically?


Whatever the details of your toxic tort, pharmaceutical, medical device, or environmental case, odds are that you will confront multiple scientific studies, sometimes referred to by plaintiffs as “lines of evidence.” Plaintiff counsel will then assert that this evidence, “taken as a whole,” supports their case. Synthesizing these scientific studies into a coherent assessment is ultimately what the legal controversy is all about. Therefore, the methodology for performing this assessment is a critical component of your case.

5 Types of EHS Experts to Consider for Your Next Toxic Tort or Environmental Case

describe the image

We discussed in our previous post 10 tips for preparing your environmental health and safety (EHS) expert. As you consider the retention of one or more EHS professionals for your case, the first step is to determine which type of EHS professional could provide valuable testimony that provide your client with opinions that will help them prevail in their case.

10 Tips for Preparing Your Expert in Environmental Health and Safety


If you’re involved with a toxic tort or environmental contamination case with alleged exposures to chemical, biological or physical agents, an Environment Health & Safety (EHS) professional may be just the expert you need to provide winning testimony for your case. For example, in a toxic tort case, plaintiff may allege that past exposure to a chemical or product has caused an adverse event, illness, well defined disease or syndrome. In an environmental case, alleged contamination of air, soil, sediment or water may pose a current or potential concern for future illness or disease among nearby residents.

New Study Expected to Impugn Pesticides, But Is It Legit?

New Call-to-Action

A new epidemiological study linking autism with pesticide exposure is expected to surface soon, according to our sources in the scientific community. The study was commissioned by Childhood Autism Risks from Genes and Environment (CHARGE). We anticipate that the mainstream media and some in the scientific community will latch onto the study because the rising rate of autism is alarming, and the public is understandably searching for answers. But we would caution the scientific community, the media, and the public to approach the study with skepticism instead of automatically buying into the results.

All Posts